IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/inrsre/v3y1978i1p49-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Population Dispersal from Major Metropolitan Regions: An International Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel R. Vining Jr

    (Regional Science Department,University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19174 USA)

  • Thomas Kontuly

    (School of Social Sciences, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California 92664 USA)

Abstract

Of the eighteen countries studied in this paper, eleven (Japan, Sweden, Norway, Italy, Denmark, New Zealand, Belgium, France, West Germany, East Germany, and The Netherlands) show either a reversal in the direction of net population flow from their sparsely populated, peripheral regions to their densely populated core regions or a drastic reduction in the level of this net flow. In the first seven of these eleven countries, this reversal or reduction became evident only in the 1970s; in the last four, its onset was recorded m the 1960s. Six countries (Hungary, Spain, Finland, Poland, South Korea, and Taiwan) have yet to show an attenuation in the movement of persons into their most densely populated regions. Some possibly unreliable British data likewise fail to reveal a slackening in the "drift south" of the British population. Three additional discoveries described in this paper are the following: (1) Migration continues strong into the capital regions of the three Eastern European countries studied here (Poland, Hungary, and East Germany). However, the low natural increase of these regions has blunted their expansion. (2) Though domestic migration into the capital regions of France, Sweden, and Norway has declined dramatically, foreign immigration into these regions remains at a high level. (3) Net domestic migration into the core regions of Sweden, Japan, and Italy, countries separated by vast distances, fluctuate from year to year in a remarkably similar manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel R. Vining Jr & Thomas Kontuly, 1978. "Population Dispersal from Major Metropolitan Regions: An International Comparison," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 3(1), pages 49-73, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:3:y:1978:i:1:p:49-73
    DOI: 10.1177/016001767800300102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016001767800300102
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/016001767800300102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. Tucker, 1976. "Changing patterns of migration between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas in the United States: Recent evidence," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 13(4), pages 435-443, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bar-El, Raphael & Parr, John B., 2002. "From metropolis to metropolis-based region: the case of Tel-Aviv," ERSA conference papers ersa02p392, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Phillips, Martin & Dickie, Jennifer, 2019. "Moving to or from a carbon dependent countryside," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 253-268.
    3. Leo Sveikauskas & Peter Townroe & Eric Hansen, 1985. "Intraregional productivity differences in São Paulo state manufacturing plants," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 121(4), pages 722-740, December.
    4. Long, John F., 1985. "Migration and the phases of population redistribution," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 29-42.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Lichter & Glenn Fuguitt, 1982. "The transition to nonmetropolitan population deconcentration," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 19(2), pages 211-221, May.
    2. P Gordon, 1979. "Deconcentration without a ‘Clean Break’," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 11(3), pages 281-289, March.
    3. Kenneth Johnson & Ross Purdy, 1980. "Recent nonmetropolitan population change in fifty-year perspective," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 17(1), pages 57-70, February.
    4. Glenn Fuguitt & Tim Heaton & Daniel Lichter, 1988. "Monitoring the metropolitanization process," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 25(1), pages 115-128, February.
    5. Ralph White, 1982. "Family size composition differentials between central city-suburb and metropolitan-nonmetropolltan migration streams," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 19(1), pages 29-36, February.
    6. Franklin Wilson, 1987. "Metropolitan and nonmetropolitan migration streams: 1935–1980," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 24(2), pages 211-228, May.
    7. Franklin Wilson, 1988. "Components of change in migration and destination-propensity rates for metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas: 1935–1980," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 25(1), pages 129-139, February.
    8. Wilbur Zelinsky, 1978. "Is Nonmetropolitan America being repopulated? The evidence from Pennsylvania’s minor civil divisions," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 15(1), pages 13-39, February.
    9. William Frey, 1979. "The changing impact of white migration on the population compositions of origin and destination metropolitan areas," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 16(2), pages 219-237, May.
    10. Kevin F. McCarthy & Peter A. Morrison, 1977. "The Changing Demographic and Economic Structure of Nonmetropolitan Areas in the United States," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 2(2), pages 123-142, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:3:y:1978:i:1:p:49-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.