IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indeco/v60y2023i4p451-476.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Untouchability, caste, and the electorate: Revisiting legacies of the Poona Pact in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Sadia Mahmood

    (Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad)

Abstract

Soon after partition, Pakistan proposed separate electorates for religious minorities, including the Scheduled Castes (SC), with hopes of establishing an Islamic democracy. This article analyses the Pakistani state’s efforts to give distinct electorates to SC, which resulted in the retention of caste as a constitutional category, primarily among ‘Hindus’. It also looks on East Pakistani politicians' unwillingness to bridge political divides in the early years of Pakistan's history. By drawing on fresh archival sources, this exploration sheds insight on the shift/transformation in East Pakistan’s conceptualisation of the nation immediately following the partition. It argues that the colonial classifications of majority, minority, caste and SC were maintained by the post-colonial state for nation-building programmes and power politics. East Pakistani leaders, on the other hand, repudiated this continuity as they sought to oppose West Pakistan's political dominance. This article also demonstrates that there is a historical discontinuity between the post-partition and the contemporary politics of the Scheduled Castes in Pakistan.

Suggested Citation

  • Sadia Mahmood, 2023. "Untouchability, caste, and the electorate: Revisiting legacies of the Poona Pact in Pakistan," The Indian Economic & Social History Review, , vol. 60(4), pages 451-476, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:indeco:v:60:y:2023:i:4:p:451-476
    DOI: 10.1177/00194646231201112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00194646231201112
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00194646231201112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indeco:v:60:y:2023:i:4:p:451-476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.