IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/indeco/v57y2020i2p139-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The elephant and imperial continuities in North India, 1200–1600CE

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Anooshahr

    (University of California, Davis, USA)

Abstract

This paper builds on my earlier study of the relationship between the elephant and imperial sovereignty in north India, extending the argument from 1200 to 1600 ce . The ritual and military use of the elephant signalled a self-conscious imperial formation, based on the Ghaznavid model, with the emperor as king-of-kings and elephant-master, ruling over subjugated tributary monarchs. However, new conditions in the sixteenth century led to the rise of a centralised and expansive state, now armed with gunpowder weapons, and thus no longer dependent on tributary relations or the elephant. The elephant, which formerly stood for divine or satanic power, was now humanised, and the emperor’s status was elevated above it as the closest living being to God. In short, studying the imperial formation in the north through its use of elephants renders meaningless the characterisation of linear evolution from a more orthodox Islamic state (‘Delhi Sultanate’) to a tolerant one (‘Mughal Empire’).

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Anooshahr, 2020. "The elephant and imperial continuities in North India, 1200–1600CE," The Indian Economic & Social History Review, , vol. 57(2), pages 139-169, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:indeco:v:57:y:2020:i:2:p:139-169
    DOI: 10.1177/0019464620912614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0019464620912614
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0019464620912614?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:indeco:v:57:y:2020:i:2:p:139-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.