IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v77y2024i3p366-395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconsidering Occupational Internal Labor Markets: Incidence and Consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Osterman

Abstract

What are useful ways to characterize varying employment systems? This article returns to an older idea, Internal Labor Markets (ILMs). The traditional assumption characterized ILMs as the core of the labor market but current thinking argues that ILMs have frayed. Little direct measurement has been carried out, however, and both viewpoints have relied on proxies or case studies. The author utilizes a new survey of employed US workers to provide an estimate of the incidence of ILMs and finds that between 25 and 40% percent of adult workers are in ILMs. The article then elaborates theory regarding the practices of ILMs, a theory grounded in the idea of complementary bundles of human resource practices, and asks what are the correlates of being in an ILM. Findings show that although wages in ILMs are no higher than non-ILM wages, ILMs are positively associated with other aspects of job quality and attitudes across the board.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Osterman, 2024. "Reconsidering Occupational Internal Labor Markets: Incidence and Consequences," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 77(3), pages 366-395, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:77:y:2024:i:3:p:366-395
    DOI: 10.1177/00197939241242089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00197939241242089
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00197939241242089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:77:y:2024:i:3:p:366-395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.