IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v70y2017i4p976-1007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pension Structure and Employee Turnover: Evidence from a Large Public Pension System

Author

Listed:
  • Dan Goldhaber
  • Cyrus Grout
  • Kristian L. Holden

Abstract

Public pension systems in many U.S. states face large funding shortfalls, and policymakers have considered moving toward defined contribution (DC) pension structures in the interest of reducing the likelihood of future shortfalls. Concerns exist, however, that such changes might increase levels of employee turnover. The empirical evidence on the relationship between pension structure and turnover is mixed, and is quite limited in the case of public-sector plans. The authors study a single class of public-sector employees (teachers) who are enrolled in either a traditional defined benefit (DB) plan or a hybrid DB-DC plan during overlapping periods of time. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the authors find little evidence that the introduction of the hybrid plan increased employee turnover; in fact, they find that turnover is lower among teachers who transferred out of the DB plan into the hybrid plan. Employers may benefit by shifting the debate away from plan structure per se and toward a discussion of how to provide employees with pension plans they will highly value.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan Goldhaber & Cyrus Grout & Kristian L. Holden, 2017. "Pension Structure and Employee Turnover: Evidence from a Large Public Pension System," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 70(4), pages 976-1007, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:70:y:2017:i:4:p:976-1007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ilr.sagepub.com/content/70/4/976.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:70:y:2017:i:4:p:976-1007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.