IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v38y1984i1p26-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wage Comparability in the U.S. Postal Service

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey M. Perloff
  • Michael L. Wachter

Abstract

Federal law requires that the U.S. Postal Service pay wages comparable to those paid in the private sector. The authors argue that the appropriate test of that concept is a comparison of the wages paid to all comparably skilled workers, not only to white male workers in the private sector. By that standard, the authors conclude, from an analysis of CPS data, that in 1978 postal workers enjoyed a 21 percent wage advantage. They also point to the low quit rates and long employment queues in the Postal Service as evidence confirming that the wage of postal workers is well above that of comparable workers elsewhere. The authors predict that since the mail transmission market has become increasingly competitive, either the wage advantage of postal workers will decline or postal jobs will continue to shift to the private sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey M. Perloff & Michael L. Wachter, 1984. "Wage Comparability in the U.S. Postal Service," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 38(1), pages 26-35, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:38:y:1984:i:1:p:26-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ilr.sagepub.com/content/38/1/26.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:38:y:1984:i:1:p:26-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.