IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ijcgvn/v1y2008i1p24-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Governance Ratings: A Powerful Tool of Corporate Accountability

Author

Listed:
  • Madan Bhasin Dr.

Abstract

Under the mounting pressure from the various regulatory bodies and institutional investors, the corporate-sector has been forced to re-evaluate and continuously improve their Corporate Governance (CG) systems. Conscientious boards, nowadays, want to benchmark their companies CG policies against their peers. In fact, CG rating system can provide �useful� indication of the governance environment prevalent in different countries, and across individual companies. Due to the complexity of �specific� CG matters, there is an increasingly felt need for having a �quantitative� evaluation methodology for CG and boards. To that end, some professional rating agencies have recently started offering their services and also providing ranking �scorecards� for a fee. The ISS, GMI, TCL, S&Ps and Deminor are providing cross-border rating services to companies. Moreover, several countries have developed �CG Scorecards� that fulfills the goals defined by analysts and investors. Even though CG scorecards are not always perfect, but still they are widely accepted by the national and international financial communities. Undoubtedly, such rating systems will provide a useful �benchmark� for the investors, who identify �good� CG with a well-run and wellmanaged company. This article focuses on CG ratings as a powerful tool for evaluating the corporations & board accountability. Let us hope, �systematic� application of these rating systems, across the globe, will prove to be a �safety valve� to control fraud and mismanagement in the long-term.

Suggested Citation

  • Madan Bhasin Dr., 2008. "Corporate Governance Ratings: A Powerful Tool of Corporate Accountability," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 1(1), pages 24-45, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ijcgvn:v:1:y:2008:i:1:p:24-45
    DOI: 10.1177/0974686220080103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0974686220080103
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0974686220080103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CG Rating; CG Evaluation;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ijcgvn:v:1:y:2008:i:1:p:24-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.