IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v37y2013i1p3-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Specialty Courts Achieve Better Outcomes for Children in Foster Care Than General Courts?

Author

Listed:
  • Frank A. Sloan

    (Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA)

  • Elizabeth J. Gifford

    (Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA)

  • Lindsey M. Eldred

    (Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA)

  • Kofi F. Acquah

    (Department of Economics, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA)

  • Claire E. Blevins

    (Department of Clinical Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA)

Abstract

Objective:This study assessed the effects of unified family and drug treatment courts (DTCs) on the resolution of cases involving foster care children and the resulting effects on school performance.Method:The first analytic step was to assess the impacts of presence of unified and DTCs in North Carolina counties on time children spent in foster care and the type of placement at exit from foster care. In the second step, the same data on foster care placements were merged with school records for youth in Grades 3–8 in public schools. The effect of children’s time in foster care and placement outcomes on school performance as measured by math and reading tests, grade retention, and attendance was assessed using child fixed-effects regression.Results:Children in counties with unified family courts experienced shorter foster care spells and higher rates of reunification with parents or primary caregivers. Shorter foster care spells translated into improved school performance measured by end-of-grade reading and math test scores. Adult DTCs were associated with lower probability of reunification with parents/primary caregivers.Conclusion:The shortened time in foster care implies an efficiency gain attributable to unified family courts, which translate into savings for the court system through the use of fewer resources. Children also benefit through shortened stays in temporary placements, which are related to some improved educational outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank A. Sloan & Elizabeth J. Gifford & Lindsey M. Eldred & Kofi F. Acquah & Claire E. Blevins, 2013. "Do Specialty Courts Achieve Better Outcomes for Children in Foster Care Than General Courts?," Evaluation Review, , vol. 37(1), pages 3-34, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:37:y:2013:i:1:p:3-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://erx.sagepub.com/content/37/1/3.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:37:y:2013:i:1:p:3-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.