IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v30y2012i1p78-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Devolution, Institutions, and Organisations: Changing Models of Regional Development Agencies

Author

Listed:
  • Mike Danson

    (Business School, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, Scotland)

  • Greg Lloyd

    (School of the Built Environment, University of Ulster, Jordanstown Campus, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, County Antrim BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland)

Abstract

Prior to devolution, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland each had their own autonomous development organisations to undertake and promote regional economic planning and development within their respective territories. These operated within a national UK regional policy framework. An expectation of devolution was that the development organisations would continue to evolve in different ways according to the prevailing and anticipated economic conditions and differentiated needs and priorities of the regional economies. Indeed, the model was further extended. In England, for example, regional development agencies were established as an integral part of the new intended Regional Assembly infrastructure—providing important economic development delivery functions to the new political bodies. In general terms, a more effective integration of planning, infrastructure provision, business development and investment, and economic development was anticipated at the regional level. This was held as an effective means of contributing to national economic growth and competitiveness objectives: themselves key and pivotal rationales for political devolution. On the basis of benchmarking exercises and academic and policy literature we review and analyse the significant changes that have taken place in the institutions which have been generated across the UK since the late 1990s, presenting and contrasting each nation's and region's experiences with an appreciation of their specific powers and resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Mike Danson & Greg Lloyd, 2012. "Devolution, Institutions, and Organisations: Changing Models of Regional Development Agencies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(1), pages 78-94, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:30:y:2012:i:1:p:78-94
    DOI: 10.1068/c1145r
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c1145r
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c1145r?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin Morgan, 2007. "The Polycentric State: New Spaces of Empowerment and Engagement?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1237-1251.
    2. Mark Goodwin & Martin Jones & Rhys Jones, 2005. "Devolution, constitutional change and economic development: Explaining and understanding the new institutional geographies of the British state," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 421-436.
    3. Michael Keating, 1998. "The New Regionalism in Western Europe," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1193.
    4. Alan Harding, 2007. "Taking City Regions Seriously? Response to Debate on ‘City‐Regions: New Geographies of Governance, Democracy and Social Reproduction’," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 443-458, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Harrison, 2008. "Stating the Production of Scales: Centrally Orchestrated Regionalism, Regionally Orchestrated Centralism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 922-941, December.
    2. lain Deas & Alex Lord, 2006. "From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1847-1877, September.
    3. Gordon Macleod & Martin Jones, 2007. "Territorial, Scalar, Networked, Connected: In What Sense a 'Regional World'?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1177-1191.
    4. Wilmsmeier, Gordon & Monios, Jason, 2015. "The production of capitalist “smooth” space in global port operations," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 59-69.
    5. Mariona Tomàs, 2015. "If Urban Regions are the Answer, What is the Question? Thoughts on the European Experience," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 382-389, March.
    6. Graham Haughton & Philip Allmendinger, 2015. "Fluid Spatial Imaginaries: Evolving Estuarial City-regional Spaces," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 857-873, September.
    7. Marius Constantin PROFIROIU & Carmen Valentina RADULESCU, 2019. "Local Development Opportunities In The Context Of Sustainable Development By Applying The Concept Of Smart Village In Romania," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 1059-1067, November.
    8. James Hughes & Gwendolyn Sasse & Claire Gordon, 2002. "Saying `Maybe' to the `Return to Europe'," European Union Politics, , vol. 3(3), pages 327-355, September.
    9. Dejan Stjepanović, 2015. "Territoriality and Citizenship: Membership and Sub-State Polities in Post-Yugoslav Space," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(7), pages 1030-1055, August.
    10. Michael Longo, 2003. "European Integration: Between Micro‐Regionalism and Globalism," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 475-494, June.
    11. Rhys Jones & Mark Goodwin & Martin Jones & Glenn Simpson, 2004. "Devolution, State Personnel, and the Production of New Territories of Governance in the United Kingdom," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(1), pages 89-109, January.
    12. Gill Bentley & Lee Pugalis, 2013. "New directions in economic development: Localist policy discourses and the Localism Act," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(3), pages 257-274, May.
    13. John Lovering, 2001. "The Coming Regional Crisis (And How To Avoid It)," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 349-354.
    14. Svensson, Bo, 2000. "The Scope And Potential Of Multi-Level Governance In Eu External Relations - Lessons From The Euro-Arctic," ERSA conference papers ersa00p54, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Lagendijk Arnoud & Velde Martin van der & Kuijpers Mark, 2020. "Looking for causes of effects in cases: Evaluating intermunicipal collaboration in The Netherlands applying QCA," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 64(3), pages 149-164, November.
    16. Pike, Andy & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Torrisi, Gianpiero & Tselios, Vassilis & Tomaney, John, 2010. "In search of the ‘economic dividend’ of devolution: spatial disparities, spatial economic policy and decentralisation in the UK," DEMQ Working Paper Series 2010/9, University of Catania, Department of Economics and Quantitative Methods.
    17. Joe Painter, 2013. "Regional Biopolitics," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(8), pages 1235-1248, September.
    18. Maria Teresa Balaguer-Coll & Diego Prior & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2010. "Devolution Dynamics of Spanish Local Government," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(6), pages 1476-1495, June.
    19. repec:rom:campco:v:9:y:2013:i:1:p:4-16 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Aron Buzogány & Umut Korkut, 2013. "Administrative Reform and Regional Development Discourses in Hungary. Europeanisation Going NUTS?," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(8), pages 1555-1577, October.
    21. Rune Dahl Fitjar & Einar Leknes & Janne Thygesen, 2013. "Europeanisation of Regional Policy Making: A Boolean Analysis of Norwegian Counties' Participation in the Eu's Interreg Programme," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(3), pages 381-400, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:30:y:2012:i:1:p:78-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.