IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v51y2024i3p656-669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the pedestrian access potential of suburban street network retrofits

Author

Listed:
  • Rohan L Aras
  • Nicholas T Ouellette
  • Rishee K Jain

Abstract

The United States largely depends on the automobile for personal transportation. This dominance has significant consequences for society over a range of issues, including the environment, public safety, public health, and equity. The issues associated with the dominance of the automobile are most pressing in the suburbs due to their size and curvilinear street network patterns. Thus, any effort to address the negative consequences of automobile dependency in the US needs to consider retrofitting the suburbs and their street networks. We attempt to better understand the potential for street network retrofits to increase suburban pedestrian access. We consider a class of planar graph augmentation problems that attempt to increase pedestrian access to points of interest (POIs) within the study area by adding new pedestrian paths to the street network that follow existing property lines. Our methodology builds on past work on graph dilation and route directness, from the planar graph and street network communities, respectively, to score the pedestrian access disruption of individual blocks. We apply this methodology to a case study of suburban Seattle. We find that, both in the limit of all possible interventions and with a limited number of untargeted interventions, retrofits can meaningfully increase pedestrian access to POIs. Given this promise, the methods we outline present a useful starting point for discussing the potential of street network retrofits to serve non-automobile mobility in suburban communities across the US.

Suggested Citation

  • Rohan L Aras & Nicholas T Ouellette & Rishee K Jain, 2024. "Quantifying the pedestrian access potential of suburban street network retrofits," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(3), pages 656-669, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:3:p:656-669
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083231190974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083231190974
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083231190974?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:3:p:656-669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.