IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v51y2024i2p496-511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the noise still going on? Predicting repeat noise complaints with historical time course and random forest classifiers

Author

Listed:
  • Zicheng Fan
  • Valerio Signorelli

Abstract

Noise can have serious adverse effects on residents' physical and mental health. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the City of Westminster in London has seen a continuous increase in noise complaints, with a significant number of repeat complaints from the same address within a short time scale. The authorities' ability to respond to complaints is challenged. This study explores a method for predicting and identifying repeat complaints to improve the efficiency of the authorities in dealing with noise complaints. Taking the noise complaint records of the City of Westminster during 2018–2022 as research objects, the research explores the cumulative distribution characteristics and clustering pattern of noise complaints in different spatial and temporal dimensions. On this basis, for a noise complaint from a specific address, the study fits random forest classifiers to predict whether the same address is likely to have another noise complaint in future time scales. It is found that about 18.5% of all complaints had at least one previous complaint at the same address in the previous 7 days; during the lock-down period caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, areas with active commercial activities and higher housing prices experienced a significant decrease in complaints, while areas adjacent to parks and green spaces can share a similar upward trend in noise complaints. Prediction of repeat noise complaints with random forest classifiers is proved feasible. F1 scores of models to predict repeat complaints within 0 to 2nd days, 0 to 7th days and 0 to 30th days in the future are 0.55, 0.66 and 0.75, respectively. Suggestions are provided for local authorities to improve resource allocation related to noise complaint management.

Suggested Citation

  • Zicheng Fan & Valerio Signorelli, 2024. "Is the noise still going on? Predicting repeat noise complaints with historical time course and random forest classifiers," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(2), pages 496-511, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:2:p:496-511
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083231184254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083231184254
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083231184254?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:2:p:496-511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.