IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v16y1989i4p469-481.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Correct Number of Regions in Regionalisation Structures

Author

Listed:
  • K E Rosing

    (Economisch Geografisch Instituut, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

  • J J van Dijk

    (Micro-Economie en Economische Orden, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

In region building, different models of cluster analysis conform to different theoretical spatial structures. The p -median model may be quite appropriate in nodal structures. Use of the p -median model, however, raises problems about the choice of the number of groups ( p ). This choice does not arise in facility location problems. An argument is made for parallel use of optimal methods and heuristics for region building. Optimal solutions are now feasible for even large problems because of the increase in computer power. Optimal methods provide one solution for each different value of p. Heuristic methods may provide different solutions for each value of p , depending on the starting position used for the heuristic. The multiple solutions from a heuristic procedure can then be interpreted as spatial competition between locations to become medians. By counting the number of times optimal and nonoptimal solutions are located by a heuristic procedure, statistics can be developed. Such statistics can then provide an objective method to select a specific number of groups over all others. Computational experience, with both heuristic and optimal methods, is presented.

Suggested Citation

  • K E Rosing & J J van Dijk, 1989. "On the Correct Number of Regions in Regionalisation Structures," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 16(4), pages 469-481, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:16:y:1989:i:4:p:469-481
    DOI: 10.1068/b160469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b160469
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b160469?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:16:y:1989:i:4:p:469-481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.