IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v50y2018i7p1503-1509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is British economic geography in decline?

Author

Abstract

In this brief note on the movement (or should it be defection?) of UK economic geographers from geography departments into business schools, I argue that this movement is in fact part of a wider de-prioritization and emasculation of economic geography within many geography departments across the country. Yet this rundown of British economic geography has occurred precisely at a time when the importance and relevance of the subdiscipline have become increasingly recognized within national and local policy circles. Reversing the institutional decline of economic geography across the British university system is therefore imperative.

Suggested Citation

  • Ron Martin, 2018. "Is British economic geography in decline?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(7), pages 1503-1509, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:50:y:2018:i:7:p:1503-1509
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X18774050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X18774050
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X18774050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mario Cedrini & Magda Fontana, 2018. "Just another niche in the wall? How specialization is changing the face of mainstream economics [Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, and the sciences]," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 42(2), pages 427-451.
    2. Costis Hadjimichalis & Ray Hudson, 2014. "Contemporary Crisis Across Europe and the Crisis of Regional Development Theories," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(1), pages 208-218, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miguel Atienza & Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo & Nicholas Phelps, 2019. "Bridges over troubled water? Journals, geographers and economists in the field of economy and space 1980–2017," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(8), pages 1800-1823, November.
    2. Chris Gibson, 2019. "Economic geography, to what ends? From privilege to progressive performances of expertise," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(3), pages 805-813, May.
    3. Mia Gray & Jane Pollard, 2018. "Flourishing or floundering? Policing the boundaries of economic geography," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(7), pages 1541-1545, October.
    4. Daniel Cockayne & Amy Horton & Kelly Kay & Jessa Loomis & Emily Rosenman, 2018. "On economic geography's “movers†to business and management schools: A response from outside “the projectâ€," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(7), pages 1510-1518, October.
    5. Rhiannon Pugh, 2018. "Who speaks for economic geography?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(7), pages 1525-1531, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ambrosino, Angela & Cedrini, Mario & B. Davis, John, 2022. "Today’s economics: One, No One and One Hundred Thousand," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 202215, University of Turin.
    2. Panagiotis Artelaris & Yannis Tsirbas, 2018. "Anti-austerity voting in an era of economic crisis: Regional evidence from the 2015 referendum in Greece," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(4), pages 589-608, June.
    3. Mia Gray & Michael Kitson & Linda Lobao & Ron Martin, 2023. "Understanding the post-COVID state and its geographies," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18.
    4. Ramona Pîrvu & Cristian Drăgan & Gheorghe Axinte & Sorin Dinulescu & Mihaela Lupăncescu & Andra Găină, 2019. "The Impact of the Implementation of Cohesion Policy on the Sustainable Development of EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Betsy Donald & Mia Gray & Centre for Business Research, 2018. "The Double Crisis: In What Sense A Regional Problem?," Working Papers wp507, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    6. Robert Hassink & Etienne Nel & Jessie Smart & Tony Binns, 2017. "Resilience to Economic Shocks: Reflections from Zambia's Copperbelt," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 201-213, June.
    7. Sorin Cebotari & Jozsef Benedek, 2017. "Renewable Energy Project as a Source of Innovation in Rural Communities: Lessons from the Periphery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Ian Coelho de Souza Almeida & Rafael Galvão de Almeida & Lucas Resende de Carvalho, 2017. "Academic rankings and pluralism : the case of Brazil and the new version of Qualis," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG 569, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    9. Fontana, Magda & Iori, Martina & Leone Sciabolazza, Valerio & Souza, Daniel, 2022. "The interdisciplinarity dilemma: Public versus private interests," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(7).
    10. Michael Storper, 2018. "Separate Worlds? Explaining the current wave of regional economic polarization," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 247-270.
    11. Maximilian Tallgauer & Christoph Schank, 2023. "Rethinking Economics Education for Sustainable Development: A Posthumanist Practice Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, June.
    12. Claudius Gräbner & Birte Strunk, 2020. "Pluralism in economics: its critiques and their lessons," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 311-329, October.
    13. Athina Arampatzi, 2017. "The spatiality of counter-austerity politics in Athens, Greece: Emergent ‘urban solidarity spaces’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(9), pages 2155-2171, July.
    14. Dieter Bögenhold, 2017. "The order of social sciences: sociology in dialogue with neighbouring disciplines," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 27-52, November.
    15. Lynne Chester, 2019. "Judging Heterodox Economics: A Response to Hodgson's Criticisms," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Dieter Bögenhold, 2020. "History of Economic Thought as an Analytic Tool: why Past Intellectual Ideas Must Be Acknowledged as Lighthouses for the Future," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 26(1), pages 73-87, February.
    17. Luigi Di Caro & Marco Guerzoni & Massimiliano Nuccio & Giovanni Siragusa, 2017. "A Bimodal Network Approach to Model Topic Dynamics," Papers 1709.09373, arXiv.org.
    18. Ingrid Kvangraven & Carolina Alves, 2020. "¿Por qué tan hostil? Quebrando mitos sobre la economía heterodoxa," Ensayos de Economía 18314, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellín.
    19. Michel De Vroey & Luca Pensieroso, 2021. "Grounded in Methodology, Certified by Journals: The Rise and Evolution of a Mainstream in Economics," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2021015, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    20. Mustafa Cem KIRANKABEŞ & Abdullah ERKUL, 2019. "Regional knowledge production in Central and East European countries: R&D factor productivity and changes in performances," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 10, pages 25-44, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:50:y:2018:i:7:p:1503-1509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.