IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v21y1989i9p1229-1240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evolution and Implications of Mineral Planning Policy in the National Parks of England and Wales

Author

Listed:
  • D I Brotherton

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, England)

Abstract

Quarrying upsets national park interests, perhaps more than any other activity. As a consequence, considerable effort has been expended over the past forty years to devise appropriate mineral planning policies for the parks. Three approaches are identified and are indicated by the names of the ministers that propounded them: the Silkin test (1949); the Sandford approach (1976); and the Waldegrave formulation (1987). Particular importance is attached to clarifying the premise on which each of the three policies is based, and to exploring the implications of the policies, both for the national parks and for the rest of the countryside. The Silkin test and Sandford approach are shown to have markedly different premises and consequences, whereas the recently propounded Waldegrave formulation appears to be intermediate to the other two. But the consequences of Waldegrave are shown to be inconsistent with its intermediate premise. For all the dressing up, Waldegrave produces outcomes no different from Silkin's, and current mineral policy is effectively back where it started. The desirability of this is considered.

Suggested Citation

  • D I Brotherton, 1989. "The Evolution and Implications of Mineral Planning Policy in the National Parks of England and Wales," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 21(9), pages 1229-1240, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:21:y:1989:i:9:p:1229-1240
    DOI: 10.1068/a211229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a211229
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a211229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:21:y:1989:i:9:p:1229-1240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.