IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v11y2000i6p681-695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Controlling Pollution Using Economic Instruments in Competitive Electricity Markets: The Challenges of Multilevel Governance

Author

Listed:
  • John Crosisca
  • Aynsley Kellow

Abstract

In Australia, as in many other developed countries, reforms are taking place which aim at liberalising electricity markets and opening them up to more competition. The hope has been that this will achieve a market for electricity which is more efficient, provide more cost reflective prices and achieve better environmental outcomes. The relationship between market-based structures for electricity industries and improved environmental outcomes is problematic, however. The environmental sensitivity of Australian utilities has not been helped by their public ownership and frequent use by state governments as agents of economic development, so that while putting them on a more commercial footing might remedy past problems, it is by no mans clear that the full range of externalities associated with electricity generation will necessarily be addressed without putting in place policy mechanisms which will create incentives for improved environmental performance. Federal systems such as Australia permit a degree of diversity in how states address such questions, but the existence of distinct subnational political units can also create problems relating to competitiveness between utilities operating in different jurisdictions but trading in a single market. Similar issues are likely to arise in the European Union, where, under the subsidiarity principle, there are analogies with federal states, 1 and more widely in competitive markets across national boundaries. This paper demonstrates these problems by exploring issues which have arisen as the result of different policy settings being adopted by states for pollution control by electric utilities, and notes that the national government in Australia has been reluctant to exercise jurisdiction to address these problems. The commission of the European Union has been less reluctant to use issues such as climate change to enhance its competence. The paper suggests that this reluctance in Australia stems from the potential for national approaches to provoke conflict between the states in the Australian federation, and argues that while this reluctance is appropriate for pollutants with predominantly local impacts, climate change issues are likely to require a greater role for the Commonwealth than it has thus far been willing to assume.

Suggested Citation

  • John Crosisca & Aynsley Kellow, 2000. "Controlling Pollution Using Economic Instruments in Competitive Electricity Markets: The Challenges of Multilevel Governance," Energy & Environment, , vol. 11(6), pages 681-695, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:11:y:2000:i:6:p:681-695
    DOI: 10.1260/0958305001500482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1260/0958305001500482
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1260/0958305001500482?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. J Sarkis & J J Cordeiro, 2009. "Investigating technical and ecological efficiencies in the electricity generation industry: are there win-win opportunities?," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(9), pages 1160-1172, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:11:y:2000:i:6:p:681-695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.