IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v24y2023i1p102-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differentiation through flexibility in implementation: Strategic and substantive uses of discretion in EU directives

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Zbiral

    (Department of Constitutional Law and Political Science, 112471Faculty of Law, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Sebastiaan Princen

    (School of Governance, Faculty of Law, Economics and Governance, 8125Utrecht University, The Netherlands)

  • Hubert Smekal

    (School of Law and Criminology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Maynooth University, Kildare, Ireland)

Abstract

This article analyses the extent to which European Union (EU) directives allow for variation in domestic implementation. Such flexibility in implementation may be used to deal with heterogeneity among member states. Based on an original dataset of 164 directives adopted between 2006 and 2015, we find that the use of flexibility is associated more with efforts to accommodate differences between national policies (substantive use of discretion) than with attempts to facilitate the decision-making process in and between EU legislative institutions (strategic use of discretion). Although flexibility may be used to address some of the same concerns that drive differentiated integration (DI), the situations in which each is most likely to be used are distinct because they approach the divergences between member states differently.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Zbiral & Sebastiaan Princen & Hubert Smekal, 2023. "Differentiation through flexibility in implementation: Strategic and substantive uses of discretion in EU directives," European Union Politics, , vol. 24(1), pages 102-120, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:24:y:2023:i:1:p:102-120
    DOI: 10.1177/14651165221126072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14651165221126072
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/14651165221126072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:24:y:2023:i:1:p:102-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.