IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecolab/v6y1995i2p252-287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protecting the Low Income Earner: Minimum Wage Determination in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • David H. Plowman

Abstract

The Minimum Wage, in various variants, has been an important part of Australian wage determination for over a century. This paper documents the development of the minimum wage and in so doing highlights the pivotal role of the Sunshine Harvester case. That case left a number of legacies which are examined in other parts of the paper. These include the bifurcated nature of wage determination, consideration of family size, the sexual division of labour and wages, the conflict between needs and capacity to pay, wage adjustment indexes and the role of minimum wages in a decentralised wages system.

Suggested Citation

  • David H. Plowman, 1995. "Protecting the Low Income Earner: Minimum Wage Determination in Australia," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 6(2), pages 252-287, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:6:y:1995:i:2:p:252-287
    DOI: 10.1177/103530469500600206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/103530469500600206
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/103530469500600206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Reg HAMILTON & Matt NICHOL, 2023. "One hundred years of dynamic minimum wage regulation: Lessons from Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 162(3), pages 407-429, September.
    2. David H. Plowman & Chris Perryer, 2010. "Moral Sentiments and the Minimum Wage," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 21(2), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:6:y:1995:i:2:p:252-287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.