IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecolab/v25y2014i1p28-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of privatisation on union membership and density: A Western Australian case study

Author

Listed:
  • Bobbie Oliver

Abstract

Falling membership numbers and declining union density are issues of concern for many Australian unions. Australian Bureau of Statistics figures show that between 2005 and 2008, trade union membership declined from 22.4% to 18.9% of the workforce. Studies and statistics consistently show that union membership and density are lowest in Western Australia, despite trend reversals elsewhere. Using the Western Australian branches of two ‘blue-collar’ unions – the Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union, Western Australian Branch and the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union, covering a range of transport, metal working, printing and manufacturing trades – as examples, this article examines whether privatisation has contributed significantly to falling trade union density and membership in this state. These unions represented large public sector workforces. In order to test the hypothesis that privatisation has adversely affected union membership and density, the article examines three areas: changing policies in the Australian Labor Party, the breaking down of union culture and changes in trade training, and concludes that privatisation is a significant factor in the recent decline of these two unions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bobbie Oliver, 2014. "The impact of privatisation on union membership and density: A Western Australian case study," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 25(1), pages 28-46, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:25:y:2014:i:1:p:28-46
    DOI: 10.1177/1035304613518475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1035304613518475
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1035304613518475?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McKenzie, Margaret, 2007. "Is privatisation good for investment in Australia?," Working Papers eco_2007_15, Deakin University, Department of Economics.
    2. Tim Strangleman, 2004. "Work Identity at the End of the Line?," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-51385-3, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bobbie Oliver, 2016. "The Impact of Union Amalgamation on Membership," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(3), pages 21582440166, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danny MacKinnon & Andrew Cumbers & Jon Shaw, 2008. "Rescaling Employment Relations: Key Outcomes of Change in the Privatised Rail Industry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(6), pages 1347-1369, June.
    2. Barbara Foweraker & Leanne Cutcher, 2020. "An Ageless Gift: Reciprocity and Value Creation By and For Older Workers," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(4), pages 533-549, August.
    3. Ian Roberts, 2006. "Taking age out of the workplace: putting older workers back in?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 20(1), pages 67-86, March.
    4. Jupe, Robert, 2009. "A “fresh start” or the “worst of all worlds”? A critical financial analysis of the performance and regulation of Network Rail in Britain’s privatised railway system," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 175-204.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:25:y:2014:i:1:p:28-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.