IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v31y2010i4p497-519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The case for ‘beneficial constraints’: Why permissive voluntarism impedes workplace cooperation in Ireland

Author

Listed:
  • Tony Dobbins

    (National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland, anthony.dobbins@nuigalway.ie)

Abstract

Drawing on existing literature and two case studies of workplace cooperation in Ireland, this article illustrates that although Ireland has had national-level consensus bargaining since 1987, workplace-level cooperation is rare. This can be largely attributed to Ireland’s permissive voluntarist institutional and employment relations context, characterized by limited institutional coordination linking national and workplace governance, and which renders workplaces particularly exposed to the contradictions of capitalism. The result is that few employers construct and maintain workplace bargains with their employees. Focusing on the concept of ‘beneficial constraints’ on employer choice, it is concluded that if efficient and fair workplace coalitions are to increase, the state would need to reform the permissive voluntarism dominating Irish employment relations by ‘reinstitutionalizing’ workplace pluralism through proactive policy interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Tony Dobbins, 2010. "The case for ‘beneficial constraints’: Why permissive voluntarism impedes workplace cooperation in Ireland," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 31(4), pages 497-519, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:31:y:2010:i:4:p:497-519
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X10365572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X10365572
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X10365572?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:31:y:2010:i:4:p:497-519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.