IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/compsc/v12y1992i1p17-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nuclear Deterrence Theory: The Record of Aggregate Testing and An Alternative Research Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Harvey

    (Dalhousie University, Political Science)

  • Patrick James

    (Florida State University, Political Science)

Abstract

One of the most controversial subjects among students of international politics is the role of rational choice in deterrence. Disagreement is especially intense regarding application to the nuclear setting. Progress in that debate depends on identifying evidence appropriate for testing a wide range of propositions. The overall purpose of this review is to assess the record of aggregate evaluation in order to obtain guidance for further research. This investigation unfolds in several stages. First, studies appropriate for reassessment are placed in the general context of deterrence literature. Second, models, data, and testing procedures are presented and explained. Third, a pair of criteria for evaluation-validity and reliability-are applied to the above-noted quantitative studies. Fourth, and finally, new directions for testing are suggested, with emphasis on a more unified approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Harvey & Patrick James, 1992. "Nuclear Deterrence Theory: The Record of Aggregate Testing and An Alternative Research Agenda," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 12(1), pages 17-45, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:12:y:1992:i:1:p:17-45
    DOI: 10.1177/073889429201200102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/073889429201200102
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/073889429201200102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:12:y:1992:i:1:p:17-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.