IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v32y2023i3p452-462.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accuracy and Interrater Agreement of Registered Nurses’ Assignment of Apgar Scores to Standardized Clinical Vignettes

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra D. Michel
  • Nancy K. Lowe

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to test whether registered nurses assign the correct Apgar score when provided all pertinent data, whether they assign an Apgar score even if all pertinent data are not provided, and to evaluate the Apgar score’s interrater agreement. We conducted a REDCap survey and provided nurses with color photograph/vignette combinations of neonates, some of which lacked pertinent data points needed to correctly assign Apgar scores. Over 90% of study participants assigned Apgar scores even if data points for heart rate or respiratory effort were omitted. Participants’ correct assignment of the component score for respiratory effort was affected by the description of the respiratory effort and whether neonatal heart rate was known. Interrater agreement was generally low to moderate. Our findings are consistent with earlier findings and support the conclusion that the Apgar score requires significant revision or needs to be retired and replaced.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra D. Michel & Nancy K. Lowe, 2023. "Accuracy and Interrater Agreement of Registered Nurses’ Assignment of Apgar Scores to Standardized Clinical Vignettes," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 32(3), pages 452-462, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:32:y:2023:i:3:p:452-462
    DOI: 10.1177/10547738231155266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10547738231155266
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10547738231155266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:32:y:2023:i:3:p:452-462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.