IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v31y2022i7p1296-1307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Revised Self-Care of Heart Failure Index v7.2

Author

Listed:
  • JinShil Kim
  • Kye Hun Kim
  • Young-Hyo Lim
  • Seongkum Heo
  • Keumyi Moon
  • Mi Sook Oh
  • Minjeong An

Abstract

The psychometric properties of the Korean version of the revised Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) remain undetermined; therefore, we aimed to evaluate the construct and convergent validity and reliability of the Korean version of the SCHFI in Korean patients with heart failure (HF). Using a cross-sectional design, 207 patients with HF provided data on self-care and self-efficacy in self-care for this psychometric testing. The confirmatory factor analysis supported the construct validity of the Korean version with a three-factor structure: Self-Care Maintenance, Symptom Perception, and Self-Care Management. Convergent validity was supported by the significant relationships between self-efficacy and each scale of the Korean version of the SCHFI ( r  = .425–.549, p  

Suggested Citation

  • JinShil Kim & Kye Hun Kim & Young-Hyo Lim & Seongkum Heo & Keumyi Moon & Mi Sook Oh & Minjeong An, 2022. "Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Revised Self-Care of Heart Failure Index v7.2," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 31(7), pages 1296-1307, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:31:y:2022:i:7:p:1296-1307
    DOI: 10.1177/10547738221106590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10547738221106590
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10547738221106590?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:31:y:2022:i:7:p:1296-1307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.