IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/chnrpt/v51y2015i4p293-310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Historical and Anthropological Comparative of the Family Planning Strategies of India and China

Author

Listed:
  • Aprajita Sarcar

    (Doctoral Candidate, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada 14as58@queensu.ca)

Abstract

The article tracks the evolution of the family planning programmes in India and China and the conceptual linkages between the two. This comparison, in turn, serves as an entry point for studying the following: The role that the family plays in becoming the site of governance and deploying state-led capitalism in the two countries. The assumptions behind the development trajectories in both countries. What are the ways in which the policies amplified patrilineal hierarchies within families to produce the disturbing outcome of the missing girl child—this even as the family planning policies became constrained as they were acting within a cultural milieu of patriarchy. The article uses studies and commentaries across disciplines, such as, historical demography and anthropology to situate its arguments. The conclusion it attempts to put forth is that the small family norm was operationalised in various differing ways in both states, and yet the commonalities that arose were the following: The declining sex ratio in both states as an immediate repercussion of the enforcement of the small family norm. The structuring of the health services around the family planning operations. The small family norm becoming an end in itself, as a mode of reaching a level of development akin to the West, and as an ethic for modernising nations.

Suggested Citation

  • Aprajita Sarcar, 2015. "A Historical and Anthropological Comparative of the Family Planning Strategies of India and China," China Report, , vol. 51(4), pages 293-310, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:51:y:2015:i:4:p:293-310
    DOI: 10.1177/0009445515597796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0009445515597796
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0009445515597796?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:51:y:2015:i:4:p:293-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.