IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/chnrpt/v49y2013i1p25-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fundamentally Unacceptable yet Occasionally Unavoidable: China’s Options on External Interference in the Middle East

Author

Listed:
  • Yitzhak Shichor

Abstract

China’s ‘non-interference’ policy is not a new phenomenon. It originates in pre-modern Chinese history when the Empire had been isolated from the rest of the world, as well as in the Mao era when the Chinese–even if they had the will to interfere–did not have the capabilities. Post-Mao and post-Cold War, China has the capabilities but not yet the will to become more involved. Still, economic prosperity and growing political prominence have forced Beijing to compromise. Fundamentally, China’s first option remains ‘non-interference’ and settling of conflicts by the parties concerned. Yet if this fails, then the Chinese prefer an intervention by a regional or professional organisation. If this attempt too, fails, then, reluctantly, Beijing turns to the United Nations Security Council as an option. The worst option is external and independent intervention. All these options are evident in China’s Middle East policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Yitzhak Shichor, 2013. "Fundamentally Unacceptable yet Occasionally Unavoidable: China’s Options on External Interference in the Middle East," China Report, , vol. 49(1), pages 25-41, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:49:y:2013:i:1:p:25-41
    DOI: 10.1177/0009445513479219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0009445513479219
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0009445513479219?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:49:y:2013:i:1:p:25-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.