IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ausman/v9y1984i2p15-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining Structural Change in Organisations: Contingency Determinism or Contingency Fit

Author

Listed:
  • Lex Donaldson

    (Australian Graduate School of Management.)

Abstract

Cross-sectional studies of organisation have yielded a number of relationships between contingencies and structure. However, some diachronic studies of changes in contingency and structure have not produced the results expected. The suggestion of this paper is that this may reflect inappropriate forms of data analysis based on a theoretical orientation of contingency determinism rather than contingency-fit. The former posits that a change in contingency directly causes a change in structure. The latter states that it is the lack of fit, a mismatch between contingency and structure, which leads to structural change. An illustration of the two alternative approaches is given by reference to longitudinal data on changes in strategy and structure. Two hypotheses derived from the contingency-fit model are confirmed, whereas the one derived from the contingency determinism approach is not.

Suggested Citation

  • Lex Donaldson, 1984. "Explaining Structural Change in Organisations: Contingency Determinism or Contingency Fit," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 9(2), pages 15-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:9:y:1984:i:2:p:15-24
    DOI: 10.1177/031289628400900202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/031289628400900202
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/031289628400900202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gareth P. Dyas & Heinz T. Thanheiser, 1976. "The Emerging European Enterprise," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-02515-2, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mary O'Sullivan, 1998. "The Political Economy of Corporate Governance in Germany," Macroeconomics 9805004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic, 2002. "Exporting the American Model," Post-Print hal-01892016, HAL.
    3. Maurice W. Kirby, 2000. "Operations Research Trajectories: The Anglo-American Experience from the 1940s to the 1990s," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(5), pages 661-670, October.
    4. José R. Torre & José Paulo Esperança & Jon I. Martínez, 2011. "Organizational Responses to Regional Integration Among MNEs in Latin America," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 241-267, April.
    5. Goyer, Michel, 2002. "The transformation of corporate governance in France and Germany: The role of workplace institutions," MPIfG Working Paper 02/10, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    6. Bhimani, Alnoor, 1999. "Mapping methodological frontiers in cross-national management control research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(5-6), pages 413-440, July.
    7. Gabriel CROITORU & Valentina Ofelia ROBESCU & Ion STEGAROIU & Oana OPRISAN, 2018. "Organizational Behavior from the Perspective of the Paradigm Strategy-Structure-Performance (SSP) in the Banking System," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 15-21.
    8. Krieger-Boden, Christiane, 1983. "Muster des regionalen Strukturwandels in Frankreich," Kiel Working Papers 171, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    9. West, Jonathan, 2000. "Institutions, information processing, and organization structure in research and development: evidence from the semiconductor industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 349-373, March.
    10. Richard Whittington & Andrew Pettigrew & Simon Peck & Evelyn Fenton & Martin Conyon, 1999. "Change and Complementarities in the New Competitive Landscape: A European Panel Study, 1992–1996," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(5), pages 583-600, October.
    11. Diego Armando Marín-Idárraga & Juan Carlos Cuartas-Marín, 2014. "Teorías del análisis y diseno organizacional: una revisión a los postulados contingentes y de la co-alineación estratégica," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, vol. 0(1), pages 153-168, June.
    12. Broadberry, S. N., 1995. "Comparative productivity levels in manufacturing since the Industrial Revolution: Lessons from Britain, America, Germany and Japan," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 71-95, March.
    13. Gabriel CROITORU & Valentina Ofelia ROBESCU & Ion STEGAROIU & Oana OPRISAN, 2018. "Organizational behavior from the perspective of the paradigme strategy-structure-performance (SSP) in the banking system," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 301-310.
    14. Sternquist, Brenda & Runyan, Rodney C. & Chen, Zhengyi, 2008. "The use of buying committees by Chinese retailers: The effects of environment and strategy upon structure," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 93-103.
    15. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/4usu1e1mci88iq77f9dhm4kplp is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Lex Donaldson, 2008. "Ethics Problems and Problems with Ethics: Toward a Pro-Management Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 78(3), pages 299-311, March.
    17. Marie-Laure Djelic, 2002. "Exporting the American Model: Historical Roots of Globalization," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/4usu1e1mci8, Sciences Po.
    18. Steven Toms & John Wilson, 2012. "Revisiting Chandler on the Theory of the Firm," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 22, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Hannah, L., 1997. "Marshall's 'trees' and the global 'forest': were 'giant redwoods different?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20363, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:9:y:1984:i:2:p:15-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agsm.edu.au .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.