IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v695y2021i1p292-312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Communities Moving Ahead, Falling Behind: Evidence from the Index of Deep Disadvantage

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent A. Fusaro
  • H. Luke Shaefer
  • Jasmine Simington

Abstract

Using a multidimensional index weighting factors related to income, health, and social mobility—the Index of Deep Disadvantage (IDD)—we rank the well-being of disadvantaged U.S. counties (initial scores below the median IDD) when they were on the cusp of the Great Recession and then again well into the recovery. We compare the characteristics of counties that saw improvements to those that saw declines. We find that a clear majority of counties were stable in relative rank. Counties showing improvement tended to have been worse off prerecession than counties where well-being declined. Improving counties were less likely to be urban, tended to have smaller fractions of the population identifying as Black and larger fractions as white, and had a lower proportion of jobs in manufacturing. Stable counties were, on average, the worst off pre-recession and thus remained the worst off near the end of the recovery. All county groups improved in income and employment through the recovery, but these advances were not consistently associated with gains in other areas such as incidence of low-weight births.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent A. Fusaro & H. Luke Shaefer & Jasmine Simington, 2021. "Communities Moving Ahead, Falling Behind: Evidence from the Index of Deep Disadvantage," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 695(1), pages 292-312, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:695:y:2021:i:1:p:292-312
    DOI: 10.1177/00027162211035966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00027162211035966
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00027162211035966?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:695:y:2021:i:1:p:292-312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.