IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v634y2011i1p134-152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Whites’ Racial Policy Attitudes in the Twenty-First Century: The Continuing Significance of Racial Resentment

Author

Listed:
  • Steven A. Tuch

    (George Washington University)

  • Michael Hughes

    (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech))

Abstract

A topic of long-standing interest in racial attitudes research is whites’ support for principles of racial equality on one hand coupled with their intransigence on policies designed to redress that inequality on the other. Much has been written on possible explanations of this “principle-policy gap†and what the gap reveals about the state of contemporary American race relations. In this article, the authors provide an update and partial replication of their 1996 study of whites’ views of racial policies in what has been referred to as our post-racial society. Using both General Social Survey and American National Election Survey data, the authors assess the current state of whites’ racial policy attitudes and the factors that shape those attitudes and consider whether any meaningful change has occurred in recent decades. Among the explanations of the principle-policy gap that the authors examine, one stands out as especially powerful: racial resentment, a variant of stratification ideology that focuses on the role of racial individualism in shaping white resistance to meaningful policy change. Moreover, the authors find no evidence that whites’ racial policy views have changed since the 1980s.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven A. Tuch & Michael Hughes, 2011. "Whites’ Racial Policy Attitudes in the Twenty-First Century: The Continuing Significance of Racial Resentment," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 634(1), pages 134-152, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:634:y:2011:i:1:p:134-152
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716210390288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716210390288
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716210390288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:634:y:2011:i:1:p:134-152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.