IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v363y1966i1p108-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sharp Practice in Merchandising and Advertising

Author

Listed:
  • E.T. Grether

    (Graduate School of Business Administration, University of California, Berkeley)

Abstract

Practices in merchandising and advertising should not be appraised merely in terms of traditional mores, ethical codes, and rules of conduct in the United States. Traditional ethical precepts must be interpreted also in relation to the re quirements of the "rule of competition," our announced na tional economic policy, which insists upon the independent, competitive offering of goods and services. Hence, acceptable business behavior is determined not only by community values, but also by the public regulations affecting competitive rela tions. Such regulations are becoming stricter for goods and services important to health and safety, but a large element of caveat emptor must remain in other situations under legally recognized "puffing" in advertising and selling. Existing fed eral, state, and local law regulations and agencies are entirely adequate for dealing with fraudulent and deceptive practices, given the will and resources for enforcement. It would be a mistake in judgment to try to establish "good taste" by legis lation. This aspect of community values must be expressed through a host of formal and informal voluntary programs and endeavors or through the public services. But choices between public and private offerings and voluntary, co-operative ar rangements, like choices under the competitive market system itself, should be among genuine, free alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • E.T. Grether, 1966. "Sharp Practice in Merchandising and Advertising," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 363(1), pages 108-116, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:363:y:1966:i:1:p:108-116
    DOI: 10.1177/000271626636300116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271626636300116
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000271626636300116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:363:y:1966:i:1:p:108-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.