IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v353y1964i1p27-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bosses, Machines, and Ethnic Groups

Author

Listed:
  • Elmer E. Cornwell JR

    (Department of Political Science, Brown University)

Abstract

The boss and his urban machine, though products of many factors, were virtually unthinkable without their immi grant clienteles. These gave the machine its essential mass base. And the machine operated, in effect, as virtually the only agency facilitating the political—and economic—integration of the immigrants into the American community. This was done by soliciting—or "buying"—their votes with the familiar array of machine "services," bringing their representatives into the organization, offering a career ladder to some individuals, and giving general recognition to them as a group. Then the im migration flow virtually stopped during the 1920's. This, plus various urban reforms, the development of government- sponsored welfare services, and the like ended the era of the boss. Actually, two kinds of "immigration" have gone on since the twenties. The Negro has come in increasing numbers from the rural South to northern urban centers, and the Puerto Rican has sought wider opportunity in New York City. Though the present-day urban party has far less motive and ability to deal with these newcomers in the former manner, evidence suggests that they are finding their way into the party organizations and, hence, are to some extent being represented by them.

Suggested Citation

  • Elmer E. Cornwell JR, 1964. "Bosses, Machines, and Ethnic Groups," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 353(1), pages 27-39, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:353:y:1964:i:1:p:27-39
    DOI: 10.1177/000271626435300104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271626435300104
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000271626435300104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diana Moreira & Santiago Pérez, 2022. "Who Benefits from Meritocracy?," NBER Working Papers 30113, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:353:y:1964:i:1:p:27-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.