IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v350y1963i1p115-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Historical Relationship of Liberals and Intellectuals to Organized Labor in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Maurice F. Neufeld

    (Cornell University)

Abstract

During the 1950's, liberals and intellectuals, once keenly partisan to organized labor, began to voice acute criti cism of American unions. This change, superficially consid ered, seemed to savor of tergiversation. However, a review of the historical relationship of liberals and intellectuals to union ism revealed that the close and relatively long alliance of the 1930's and 1940's itself constituted a distinctive departure from prior American experience. Moreover, the historical approach indicated that the alliance limited itself almost entirely to CIO unions as agencies of reform and excluded nearly all unions of the AFL. As the two organizations came, in time, to resemble each other in their institutional lives, disenchantment set in. This development was inevitable since liberals and intellectuals have traditionally tended to view the functions of unions as more extensive and exalted than the destiny envisaged by unions for themselves. Today, then, liberals and intellectuals have resumed their historical relationship to American union ism by becoming once again the independent guardians of the public good for the community at large.

Suggested Citation

  • Maurice F. Neufeld, 1963. "The Historical Relationship of Liberals and Intellectuals to Organized Labor in the United States," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 350(1), pages 115-128, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:350:y:1963:i:1:p:115-128
    DOI: 10.1177/000271626335000114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271626335000114
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000271626335000114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:350:y:1963:i:1:p:115-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.