IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anjomc/v7y2010i1p33-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Learning and Knowledge Management Theories in an Australian Telecommunications Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth David Strang

    (Central Queensland University, Australia, and APPC International Market Research, NY.)

Abstract

A community of practice in a communications company was examined to discover how design specialists learned and shared knowledge to produce innovative designs. Contemporary learning and knowledge management theories were used as the basis for comparison. The design team revealed how they applied learning and knowledge management principles during their internal processes. Action research, reflection inaction and nominal focus group techniques were used. Several workflow models were produced by the participants to explain and contrast learning and knowledge management as applied in e-business. The findings indicated that the team did not apply conventional learning or knowledge management methodologies, but instead used a modified learning model.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth David Strang, 2010. "Comparing Learning and Knowledge Management Theories in an Australian Telecommunications Practice," Asian Journal of Management Cases, , vol. 7(1), pages 33-54, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anjomc:v:7:y:2010:i:1:p:33-54
    DOI: 10.1177/097282011000700104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097282011000700104
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/097282011000700104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenneth David Strang, 2009. "Assessing team members' interpersonal competencies in new product development e-projects," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 335-357.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anjomc:v:7:y:2010:i:1:p:33-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.