IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/amerec/v44y2000i1p24-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Conduct and Professional Ethics among College Economics Faculty

Author

Listed:
  • David N. Laband
  • Michael J. Piette

Abstract

We present survey results that shed light on the perceived frequency and severity of 61 professional practices. Our findings, based on questionnaires completed by 728 academic economists in the United States, suggest that most of the practices that might be considered ethically suspect also are perceived to occur relatively infrequently. The mean values for the responses to our survey are significantly lower, in absolute terms, than those recorded by Mason et al. (1990), who conducted an almost identical survey in 1987 of marketing academicians. However, in relative terms the perceived severity of these practices is highly consistent between economics faculty and marketing faculty.

Suggested Citation

  • David N. Laband & Michael J. Piette, 2000. "Perceived Conduct and Professional Ethics among College Economics Faculty," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 44(1), pages 24-33, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:amerec:v:44:y:2000:i:1:p:24-33
    DOI: 10.1177/056943450004400104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/056943450004400104
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/056943450004400104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walter D. Johnson, 1991. "Qualifications, Ethics and Professional Responsibility in Forensic Economics," Journal of Forensic Economics, National Association of Forensic Economics, vol. 4(3), pages 277-285, September.
    2. Pauline Fox, 1991. "The Economic Expert in Wrongful Death/Personal Injury Cases: Workable Competition or Monopoly Power?," Journal of Forensic Economics, National Association of Forensic Economics, vol. 4(3), pages 255-262, September.
    3. Michael J. Piette, 1991. "Codes of Professional Ethics for Forensic Economists: Problems and Prospects," Journal of Forensic Economics, National Association of Forensic Economics, vol. 4(3), pages 269-276, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ofer H. Azar, 2006. "The Academic Review Process: How Can We Make it More Efficient?," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 50(1), pages 37-50, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Thornton & John Ward, 1999. "The Economist in Tort Litigation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 13(2), pages 101-112, Spring.
    2. Yee, Kenton K., 2008. "Dueling experts and imperfect verification," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 246-255, December.
    3. Maarten Pieter Schinkel, 2008. "Forensic Economics In Competition Law Enforcement," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 1-30.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:amerec:v:44:y:2000:i:1:p:24-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/aex .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.