IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rpo/ripoec/y2014i3p45-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hypothesis Testing and Ambiguity Aversion

Author

Listed:
  • Pietro Ortoleva

    (Columbia University, New York)

Abstract

We study a model of non-Bayesian updating for ambiguity averse agents, based on the Hypothesis Testing model of Ortoleva (2012). Agents have a set of priors that they update as follows. If all priors assign to new information a probability above a threshold, they update every prior using Bayes rule. Otherwise: they look at a prior over sets of priors, update it, and choose the set to which the prior over sets of priors assigns the highest likelihood. When the threshold is zero this coincides with Bayesian updating when defined, but it also prescribes behavior when it is not defined.

Suggested Citation

  • Pietro Ortoleva, 2014. "Hypothesis Testing and Ambiguity Aversion," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, issue 3, pages 45-64, July-Sept.
  • Handle: RePEc:rpo:ripoec:y:2014:i:3:p:45-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hill, Brian, 2022. "Updating confidence in beliefs," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Cheng, Xiaoyu, 2022. "Relative Maximum Likelihood updating of ambiguous beliefs," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Xiaoyu Cheng, 2019. "Relative Maximum Likelihood Updating of Ambiguous Beliefs," Papers 1911.02678, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2021.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bayes’ rule; updating; dynamic coherence; dynamic consistency; unambiguous preferences; ambiguity aversion.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rpo:ripoec:y:2014:i:3:p:45-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sabrina Marino (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.