IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/rampas/v2019y2019i33p57-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Services For Business Environment: Challenges For Implementing Industry 4.0 In Polish And Canadian Logistic Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Beata SLUSARCZYK

    (Czestochowa University of Technology; Czestochowa; Poland; North West University, Vaal Triangle, South Africa)

  • Adnan UL HAQUE

    (Business and Management; London Graduate School, London, United Kingdom)

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between Industry 4.0 technologies and logistic enterprises’ performance through interlinked mediating predictors creating challenges for effective and efficient implementation of Industry 4.0 concepts in order to examine how the public services for business environment could be effectively employed. For the purpose of fair and equal representation, we combined purposive, referral, convenience, and area-cluster sampling strategies to reach total 320 (160 each) logistic enterprises in Poland and Canada. Using SPSS 23.0, we employed multiple regression test to examine the impact of various interlinked predictors affecting the performance of logistic enterprises. Results revealed that related to Industry 4.0 limited knowledge, implementation barriers, recognition of potential changes, benefit appearance time period, preparing staff for challenges, and other priorities than introduction of Industry 4.0 statistically significantly mediate the relationship between Industry 4.0 technologies and performance of logistic enterprises in Canada and Poland. The comparative analysis revealed that apart from ‘preparing staff for challenges’, all other predictors are higher in Canada than Poland. The findings also revealed that the Industry 4.0 technologies have statistically significant impact on the Polish and Canadian logistic enterprises’ performance. Based on the findings and role of public services for business environment, recommendations are given to logistic companies for effective and efficient implementation of Industry 4.0 concepts.

Suggested Citation

  • Beata SLUSARCZYK & Adnan UL HAQUE, 2019. "Public Services For Business Environment: Challenges For Implementing Industry 4.0 In Polish And Canadian Logistic Enterprises," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2019(33), pages 57-76, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2019:y:2019:i:33:p:57-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ramp.ase.ro/_data/files/articole/2019/33-04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oana Vasile & Armenia Androniceanu, 2018. "An Overview of the Romanian Asylum Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Antonella Petrillo & Fabio De Felice & Raffaele Cioffi & Federico Zomparelli, 2018. "Fourth Industrial Revolution: Current Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities," Chapters, in: Antonella Petrillo & Raffaele Cioffi & Fabio De Felice (ed.), Digital Transformation in Smart Manufacturing, IntechOpen.
    3. Muhammad Haseeb & Hafezali Iqbal Hussain & Sebastian Kot & Armenia Androniceanu & Kittisak Jermsittiparsert, 2019. "Role of Social and Technological Challenges in Achieving a Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Sustainable Business Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Judit Nagy & Judit Oláh & Edina Erdei & Domicián Máté & József Popp, 2018. "The Role and Impact of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things on the Business Strategy of the Value Chain—The Case of Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beata Ślusarczyk & Robert Jeyakumar Nathan & Paula Pypłacz, 2021. "Employee Preparedness for Industry 4.0 in Logistic Sector: A Cross-National Study between Poland and Malaysia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Eva Benková & Peter Gallo & Beáta Balogová & Jozef Nemec, 2020. "Factors Affecting the Use of Balanced Scorecard in Measuring Company Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Georgescu Irina & Androniceanu Ane-Mari & Kinnunen Jani & Drăgulănescu Irina Virginia, 2021. "Correlative approach to digitalization and economic growth," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 44-57, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Serhiy SHKARLET & Igor OLIYCHENKO & Maksym DUBYNA & Maryna DITKOVSKA & Vladimir ZHOVTOK, 2020. "Comparative Analysis Of Best Practices In E-Government Implementation And Use Of This Experience By Developing Countries," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(34), pages 118-136, June.
    2. Agota Giedre RAIŠIENE & , Svitlana BILAN & Vainius SMALSKYS & Jolita GECIENE, 2019. "Emerging Changes In Attitudes To Inter-Institutional Collaboration: The Case Of Organizations Providing Social Services In Communities," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2019(33), pages 34-56, December.
    3. Oliver Kovacs, 2019. "Big IFs in Productivity-Enhancing Industry 4.0," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Rasha Fady Ismail & Fadi Safieddine & Rawad Hammad & Mazhar Hallak Kantakji, 2022. "Towards Sustainable Production Processes Reengineering: Case Study at INCOM Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, May.
    5. Munshi Muhammad Abdul Kader Jilani & Luo Fan & Mohammad Tazul Islam & Md. Aftab Uddin, 2020. "The Influence of Knowledge Sharing on Sustainable Performance: A Moderated Mediation Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Meena Madhavan & Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Thanapong Chaichana, 2022. "Impact of Business Model Innovation on Sustainable Performance of Processed Marine Food Product SMEs in Thailand—A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-33, August.
    7. Srivastava, Deepak Kumar & Kumar, Vikas & Ekren, Banu Yetkin & Upadhyay, Arvind & Tyagi, Mrinal & Kumari, Archana, 2022. "Adopting Industry 4.0 by leveraging organisational factors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    8. Andrea Katona & Zoltán Birkner & Erzsébet Péter, 2023. "Examining Digital Transformation Trends in Austrian and Hungarian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Xiaolei Zou & Xiaoxi Chen & Fengling Chen & Chuxin Luo & Hongyan Liu, 2020. "The Influence of Negative Workplace Gossip on Knowledge Sharing: Insight from the Cognitive Dissonance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Francis Aboagye‐Otchere & Cletus Agyenim‐Boateng & Abdulai Enusah & Theodora Ekua Aryee, 2021. "A Review of Big Data Research in Accounting," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 268-283, October.
    11. Andri Ottesen & Dieter Thom & Rupali Bhagat & Rola Mourdaa, 2023. "Learning from the Future of Kuwait: Scenarios as a Learning Tool to Build Consensus for Actions Needed to Realize Vision 2035," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, April.
    12. Mohammadreza Akbari & John L. Hopkins, 2022. "Digital technologies as enablers of supply chain sustainability in an emerging economy," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 689-710, December.
    13. Mihai Andronie & George Lăzăroiu & Roxana Ștefănescu & Cristian Uță & Irina Dijmărescu, 2021. "Sustainable, Smart, and Sensing Technologies for Cyber-Physical Manufacturing Systems: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.
    14. Sora Lee & Jaewon Yoo, 2021. "Determinants of a Firm’s Sustainable Competitive Advantages: Focused on Korean Small Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    15. Peerally, Jahan Ara & Santiago, Fernando & De Fuentes, Claudia & Moghavvemi, Sedigheh, 2022. "Towards a firm-level technological capability framework to endorse and actualize the Fourth Industrial Revolution in developing countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    16. Christian Hoyer & Indra Gunawan & Carmen Haule Reaiche, 2020. "The Implementation of Industry 4.0 – A Systematic Literature Review of the Key Factors," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 557-578, July.
    17. John Mugambwa Serumaga-Zake & John Andrew van der Poll, 2021. "Addressing the Impact of Fourth Industrial Revolution on South African Manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    18. Ying Song & Lu Yang & Stavros Sindakis & Sakshi Aggarwal & Charles Chen, 2023. "Analyzing the Role of High-Tech Industrial Agglomeration in Green Transformation and Upgrading of Manufacturing Industry: the Case of China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 3847-3877, December.
    19. Mikhail V. Vinichenko & Marina V. Rybakova & Maksim A. Malyshev & Natalia F. Bondaletova & Inna V. Chizhankova, 2019. "Improving the efficiency of the negotiation process in the social partnership system," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(1), pages 92-104, September.
    20. Monika Adamczyk & Alina Betlej, 2021. "Social determinants of digital exclusion in an ageing society. The case of Poland," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(3), pages 122-135, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public services for business environment; Industry 4.0 technologies; Industry 4.0 challenges; enterprises’ performance; comparative study.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2019:y:2019:i:33:p:57-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Androniceanu Armenia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.