IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/spower/sp1926.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Cognitive Style” Of Russian Social-Humanitarian Science: Overtaking Is Impossible, But Is Outstrippnig Possible?
[«Когнитивный Стиль» Российской Социально-Гуманитарной Науки: Обгон Невозможен, Но Возможно Опережение?]

Author

Listed:
  • Orekhov, Andrey (Орехов, Андрей)

    (Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia)

Abstract

The paper is devoted to analyzing cognitive styles in contemporary social-humanitarian sciences. «Cognitive style of science” is a complex of rules and norms of choosing the ways to explain and describe, construct and organize, prove and ground some system of scientific knowledge or other. There are three cognitive styles: the NPA (“neopositivist-analytical”)-style, the KHM (“KantHegel-Marx”)-style, and the FBB (“Foucault-Baudrillard-Bourdieu”)-style. Every style has its own virtues and «problem points”. Russian social-humanitarian science admits the KHM-style, but western science is mainly grounded on the NPA-style. In order to catch up and outstrip western science, Russian scholars should not imitate the NPA-style, but develop and deepen their own KHM-methodology. The strategy of Russian social-humanitarian sciences in contemporary scientific context should not be considered as overtaking, but outstripping with applying all cognitive potential of the KHM-style.

Suggested Citation

  • Orekhov, Andrey (Орехов, Андрей), 2019. "“Cognitive Style” Of Russian Social-Humanitarian Science: Overtaking Is Impossible, But Is Outstrippnig Possible? [«Когнитивный Стиль» Российской Социально-Гуманитарной Науки: Обгон Невозможен, Но ," Sotsium i vlast / Society and power, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, pages 7-14.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:spower:sp1926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/spower/sp1926.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:spower:sp1926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.