IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/spower/sp1870.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological aspects of assessin the Russian model of budget federalism from the viewpoint of asymmetric economic criteria
[Методические Аспекты Оценки Российской Модели Бюджетного Федерализма С Позиции Асимметричности Экономических Критериев]

Author

Listed:
  • Kachanova, Elena (Качанова, Елена)

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Korotina, Natalya (Коротина, Наталья)

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

Abstract

The cooperative model of fiscal federalism is being implemented in the Russian Federation. There are competitive components in the model, mainly in the federal financial subsidies. The authors support the view of the asymmetry of applicable models on political and geographical criteria and argue their view of the asymmetry of models by economic criteria. The authors propose the following economic criteria for assessing the model of federalism: the delineation of powers between levels of power; division of revenues and expenditures of budgets of different levels; the intergovernmental budget relations; policy of subnational and local borrowing. The analysis shows the complete asymmetry of the model of fiscal federalism in Russia: the asymmetry of expenditures, revenues, of the intergovernmental budget relations, subnational and local borrowing. The perspective directions of reforming federalism are formulated for the formation of economic stimuli of independent development in the local territories.

Suggested Citation

  • Kachanova, Elena (Качанова, Елена) & Korotina, Natalya (Коротина, Наталья), 2018. "Methodological aspects of assessin the Russian model of budget federalism from the viewpoint of asymmetric economic criteria [Методические Аспекты Оценки Российской Модели Бюджетного Федерализма С ," Sotsium i vlast / Society and power, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, pages 71-81.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:spower:sp1870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/spower/sp1870.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:spower:sp1870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.