IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/spower/sp1859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Philosophical practices of acquiring existential openness: comparative analysis of eastern and western methods
[Философские Практики Обретения Экзистенциальной Открытости: Компаративистский Анализ Восточных И Западных Методик]

Author

Listed:
  • Bogdanova, Veronika (Богданова, Вероника)

    (South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University)

Abstract

The subject matter of the research is philosophical practices of existential openness helping to form trust for life which is necessary for full development of the personality. Loss of trust to life prevents a person from self-enrichment, narrows his life activity spheres, and disconnects his existence and thinking. Existential openness is an ability of a person to perceive, realize and interpret real events and personal concerns objectively and truthfully. Objective realizing is possible only when a person is free from stereotypes, stereotyped schemes, when a person overcomes disconnection between his existence and thinking. Acceptance of life is expressed in willingness to realize multitude of possibilities which are open in front of a person. The research is done on the basis of comparative analysis of eastern and western methods such as contemplative practices of Daoism, Buddhism and Zen Buddhism compared with the methods of existential philosophy, phenomenology and humanistic psychology. Contemplative practices encourage realizing openness, acceptance of the world and one’s existence in it. These practices help a person to overcome rational fragmentation of the world. Existential approach makes it possible to define the deep problems of individual existence connected with the awareness of unsupported thinking in the situation of life choice. Phenomenological approach contributes to finding out speculative, verbal and behavior stereotypes of the life world which do not make it possible for the phenomena to speak for themselves, on the assumption of their own unique importance. The root of the problem, as the author sees it, is in separateness of thinking and existence which is defined as a psychological disease of modern civilization, the main symptom of which is the desire to set up in the world, the desire to dominate over nature, other people and oneself. Human conscience is enslaved by disfigured idea of propers, often presupposing a set of social and cultural stereotypes of this or that historic period, but not philosophical desire to be authentic, open to the truth. The author describes philosophical practices which help to overcome separateness of thinking and existence being a barrier for objective and truthful perception of reality.

Suggested Citation

  • Bogdanova, Veronika (Богданова, Вероника), 2018. "Philosophical practices of acquiring existential openness: comparative analysis of eastern and western methods [Философские Практики Обретения Экзистенциальной Открытости: Компаративистский Анализ ," Sotsium i vlast / Society and power, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, pages 100-109.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:spower:sp1859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/spower/sp1859.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:spower:sp1859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.