IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/ep1905.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of Public Inspection and Enforcement Activity for Final Beneficiaries
[Результативность Контрольно-Надзорной Деятельности Государства С Позиции Граждан]

Author

Listed:
  • Yuzhakov, Valdimir N. (Южаков, Владимир)

    (Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Dobrolyubova, Elena I. (Добролюбова, Елена)

    (Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Pokida, Andrei N. (Покида, Андрей)

    (Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Zybunovskaya, Natalia V. (Зыбуновская, Наталья)

    (Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

Abstract

Significant efforts aimed at improving state inspection and enforcement activities are underway in Russia. The final beneficiaries of such public functions are usually citizens, as inspection and enforcement affect public health, the safety of property as well as other public values such as environment or cultural heritage. However, to date there have been no methodic approaches to evaluating performance of inspection and enforcement activities from a citizen perspective. The article presents the results of a sociological survey conducted based on the authors’ methodology, which aims at collecting citizen perceptions on effectiveness of inspection and enforcement activities and the reform in this area. The survey sample accounted for 1,010 adult respondents in 28 Russian regions. The study assumes that every citizen is a potential client of inspection and enforcement bodies, whether they have had any interaction with such bodies or not. Therefore, the survey aims at collecting public perceptions of public values safety (such as life, health, property and assets, and other interests) from various risks. The study also demonstrates how personal experience in protecting public values influences the perceptions about safety. The survey shows that only 30 percent of respondents evaluate their safety from risks (threats) as very good or rather good; the safety level among respondents who have experience in taking measures to protect such values is only 18.4 percent. Overall, the sociological survey suggests the possibility and the need to include the indicators reflecting the perspective of citizens as the final beneficiaries of inspections and enforcement activities in the list of indicators for inspection reform evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuzhakov, Valdimir N. (Южаков, Владимир) & Dobrolyubova, Elena I. (Добролюбова, Елена) & Pokida, Andrei N. (Покида, Андрей) & Zybunovskaya, Natalia V. (Зыбуновская, Наталья), 2019. "Effectiveness of Public Inspection and Enforcement Activity for Final Beneficiaries [Результативность Контрольно-Надзорной Деятельности Государства С Позиции Граждан]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 1, pages 92-115, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ep1905.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. Dobrolyubova, 2016. "International Experience in Evaluating Effectiveness of Public Control in Occupational Safety," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 96-110.
    2. Elena Dobrolyubova & Natalya Zybunovskaya & Andrei Pokida & Vladimir Yuzhakov, 2017. "Evaluating impact of enforcement and inspections on business activity," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 7-25.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maslennikova, Elena V. (Масленникова, Елена) & Dobrolyubova, Elena I. (Добролюбова, Елена) & Yuzhakov, Vladimir N. (Южаков, Владимир), 2020. "Effectiveness of Control and Enforcement Activities in Selected Areas: Statistics and Sociology [Статистика И Социология Результатов Контрольно-Надзорной Деятельности]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 1, pages 90-107, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maslennikova, Elena V. (Масленникова, Елена) & Dobrolyubova, Elena I. (Добролюбова, Елена) & Yuzhakov, Vladimir N. (Южаков, Владимир), 2020. "Effectiveness of Control and Enforcement Activities in Selected Areas: Statistics and Sociology [Статистика И Социология Результатов Контрольно-Надзорной Деятельности]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 1, pages 90-107, February.
    2. Dobrolyubova, Elena I. (Добролюбова, Елена), 2017. "Economic Mechanisms Alternative to the State Control: Perspectives of Application [Альтернативные Государственному Регулированию Экономические Механизмы]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 60-81, August.
    3. Yuliya Krasheninnikova, 2018. "External Control over Temporary Disability Examination in the Russian Federation," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 153-176.
    4. Dobrolyubova Elena, 2017. "Evaluating Performance of Government Inspection Bodies: A Possible Approach," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 49-72, December.
    5. Крашенинникова Ю. А., 2018. "Внешний Контроль Над Экспертизой Временной Нетрудоспособности В Российской Федерации," Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления // Public administration issues, НИУ ВШЭ, issue 2, pages 153-176.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    state control; inspection and enforcement; public values; public safety; risks (threats).;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.