IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arjsds/v10y2020i3p30-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compressive Strength of Concrete Using Different Curing Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Yaw Osei
  • Zakari Mustapha
  • Mohammed D.H. Zebilila

Abstract

The structural use of concrete depends largely on its strength, especially compressive strength.Various tests were carried out to ascertain the properties of concrete materials, whereas test performances ofthe concrete with different mix ratios at specific ages of curing were undertaken. The study determined thecompressive strength of concrete using different curing methods. Four different methods of curing (ponding,continuous wetting, open-air curing and sprinkling with water) were used. Seventy-two (72) cubes were castusing a mix ratio of 1:2:4 and 1:3:6 with 0.5 water cement ratio and with 0.6 waters cement ratio respectively.The compressive strengths were determined after 7 days, 14 days and at 28 days of curing. Findings showthat for 1:2:4 concrete, maximum of 28-day compressive was the highest for concrete cured by ponding andthe least was by sprinkling water. Further findings show that for 1:3:6 concrete, maximum of 28-daycompressive strength was obtained using ponding and the least was open air curing. Despite ponding methodproducing the highest compressive strength of concrete, it is practically impossible to cure cubes aboveground structural elements. Wet-covering method is recommended for structural elements, such as columns,beams and slabs in other to produce concreteof a required compressive strength.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Yaw Osei & Zakari Mustapha & Mohammed D.H. Zebilila, 2020. "Compressive Strength of Concrete Using Different Curing Methods," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 10(3), pages 30-38.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arjsds:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:30-38
    DOI: 10.22610/jsds.v10i3(S).2983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/jsds/article/view/2983/1904
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/jsds/article/view/2983
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/jsds.v10i3(S).2983?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arjsds:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:30-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Tayyab (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/jsds .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.