This article revisits Akerlof's (1970) classic adverse-selection market and asks the following question: do greater information asymmetries reduce the gains from trade? Perhaps surprisingly, the answer is no. Better information on the selling side worsens the "buyer's curse," thus lowering demand, but may shift supply as well. Whether trade increases or decreases depends on the relative sizes of these effects. A characterisation is given. On the other hand, improving the buyer's information--i.e., making private information public--unambiguously improves trade so long as market demand is downward sloping. Copyright 2001 by the RAND Corporation.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Volume (Year): 32 (2001) Issue (Month): 4 (Winter) Pages: 657-66 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
F. Adriani & LG. Deidda, 2006.
"The Monopolist’s Blues,"
Working Paper CRENoS
200611, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
[Downloadable!]