Data on 30 chemical products are used to examine the sequence of divestment in declining industries. Small firms and plants might be expected to close first, given lack of scale economies. However, recent theories suggest that large producers may have greater incentives to exit or cut capacity. Both predictions receive some empirical support. Small plants had higher rates of closure, and most exiting firms were small. Holding the influence of plant size constant, large multiplant firms were more likely to close individual plants.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 21 (1990) Issue (Month): 4 (Winter) Pages: 538-554 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Suárez, Fernando F., 1960- & International Center for Research on the Management of Technology., 1991.
"Dominant designs and the survival of firms,"
Working papers
3340-91. WP (Internationa, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
[Downloadable!]