If a monopolist is selling a commodity to consumers who could, if they chose, produce a close substitute, but only after incurring heavy capital investment (we have oil in mind), then the monopolist's optimal limit pricing strategy may involve randomizing prices even though stable prices would be feasible. This runs counter to intuition, much of which rests on Samuelson's conclusion that where price stability is feasible it is desirable -- a conclusion which is only proved at a competitive equilibrium. The cause of the randomness lies in the nonconvexity of the problem, which appears to be of quite general concern. Indeed, the problem as modeled is formally identical to the choice of optimal commodity taxes which shows that random taxes may be desirable.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 9 (1978) Issue (Month): 1 (Spring) Pages: 260-269 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)