IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/jofitr/1604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of financial regulation on business models of cooperative banks in Germany

Author

Listed:

Abstract

A number of studies have highlighted the potential negative implications of stronger financial regulations, however, only a few studies have attempted to quantify the regulatory impact of Basel III on profitability. Regulation has specific costs, as well as benefits, for any economy. Likewise, it has consequences for the cost of capital of banks, as well as their interest margin. The analysis provided in this article has calculated the implications of Basel III on the profitability of banks and found that they range between 14 and 111 basis points – in case no countermeasures are taken by the respective banks. In addition, this article looks at the implications of interest rate risks on banks, and the potential negative impact on bank capital ratios in the case of interest rate risk integrated in the capital requirements of pillar 1 of Basel III. Consequently, using the balance sheet data from 756 cooperative banks in Germany, we have examined the implications of the “Basel interest rate shock,” where a sudden parallel shift in the yield curve of 200 basis points happens. The three test calculation scenarios assume the following: (1) a full implementation of Basel III without the integration of interest rate risks in the banking book of pillar 1, (2) analysis of theoretical maturities for the calculation of the interest rate risk, and (3) using legal contract terms and maturities as the basis for calculation of the interest rate risks. The results of the study show that in a scenario where the legal contract term was used, 5.3% of the analyzed group did not reach the minimum ratio for core capital of 4.5%, and another 46.6% of the banks would be below the 7% ratio and, therefore, would be limited in their earnings distributions; 86.9% of the cooperative banks in the analyzed group would fall below the threshold of 10.5%. We reach the conclusion that financial regulation should not follow the rule of “one-size-fits-all” because the business models of small cooperative banks in Germany are different to those of major global banks. A global or European uniform regulation for all banks, neglecting size and business model, could also jeopardize the culture of fixed interest financing for mid- and long-term loans for German SMEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Fischer, Matthias, 2017. "The impact of financial regulation on business models of cooperative banks in Germany," Journal of Financial Transformation, Capco Institute, vol. 46, pages 116-127.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:jofitr:1604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    G21; Banks; Financial Institutions and Services; Basel 3; Basel III; G28 Bank Regulation; interest rate risk; profitability of Banks; Business model Banks; cooperative Banks; bank Analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:jofitr:1604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Shahin Shojai (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.capco.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.