Revisiting the labor hoarding employment demand model: an economic order quantity approach
AbstractThe labor studies literature has for many years accepted the labor hoarding theory. That theory derives from seminal work by Oi (1962), Solow (1964), Miller (1971), and Fair (1985). Those studies argue that as a result of the absolute cost of hiring and training certain workers that even when the economy turns down, firms avoid layoffs as would be expected in a neoclassical framework. Consequently during such time periods companies develop a reserve supply of workers. If labor hoarding occurs the employment cycle should be less extreme than the production cycle. From December 2007 when there were 115.5 million employed workers, the American economy lost 8.5 million jobs by January 2010, a 7.35% reduction in employment. During the same period, real GDP fell by 1.25%. This paper presents a different view of the demand for labor that is based on Baumol’s (1952) cost minimization paradigm for determining the optimal level of inventories. In the framework, the stock of employees is built up beyond the current need level in good times to minimize hiring costs but during periods of slack demand by consumers the number of excess workers is reduced. This alternative model appears to fit the current changes in unemployment and GDP better than the labor hoarding theory.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Capco Institute in its journal Journal of Financial Transformation.
Volume (Year): 31 (2011)
Issue (Month): ()
Contact details of provider:
Postal: 120 Broadway, 29th Floor New York, NY 10271
Phone: +1 212 284 8600
Web page: http://www.capco.com/
Employment; Unemployment; Bankrtupcy;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists
- C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
- C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
- G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
- G33 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Bankruptcy; Liquidation
- M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Springett).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.