Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Optimization in financial engineering - an essay on 'good' solutions and misplaced exactitude

Contents:

Author Info

  • Gilli, Manfred

    ()
    (University of Geneva)

  • Schumann, Enrico

    ()
    (University of Geneva)

Abstract

We discuss the precision with which financial models are handled, in particular optimization models. We argue that precision is only required to a level that is justified by the overall accuracy of the model, and that this required precision should be specifically analyzed in order to better appreciate the usefulness and limitations of a model. In financial optimization, such analyses are often neglected; operators and researchers rather show an a priori preference for numerically-precise methods. We argue that given the (low) empirical accuracy of many financial models, such exact solutions are not needed; 'good' solutions suffice. Our discussion may appear trivial: everyone knows that financial markets are noisy, and that models are not perfect. Yet the question of the appropriate precision of models with regard to their empirical application is rarely discussed explicitly; specifically, it is rarely discussed in university courses on financial economics and financial engineering. Some may argue that the models’ errors are understood implicitly, or that in any case more precision does no harm. Yet there are costs. We seem to have a built-in incapacity to intuitively appreciate randomness and chance. All too easily then, precision is confused with actual accuracy, with potentially painful consequences.

Download Info

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Capco Institute in its journal Journal of Financial Transformation.

Volume (Year): 28 (2010)
Issue (Month): ()
Pages: 117-122

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:ris:jofitr:1416

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 120 Broadway, 29th Floor New York, NY 10271
Phone: +1 212 284 8600
Email:
Web page: http://www.capco.com/

Related research

Keywords: Financial Optimization; Financial Modeling; Heuristics; Model Evaluation; Portfolio Optimization;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Manfred Gilli & Enrico Schumann, 2010. "Calibrating Option Pricing Models with Heuristics," Working Papers 030, COMISEF.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:jofitr:1416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Springett).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.