IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/jofipe/0066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capital budgeting: a “general equilibrium” analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Cornell, Bradford

    (California Institute of Technology)

Abstract

As presented in leading corporate finance textbooks, the predominant method for making capital budgeting decisions is discounted cash flow analysis. The primary benefit of this approach is that it allows for different discount rates to be used for different projects. In this paper, I argue that this alleged benefit is, in fact, a detriment for two reasons. First, the betas that determine the differing discount rates are not only measured with significant error, but tend to drift substantially over the life of typical capital budgeting projects. Second, introducing differential discount rates is likely to conflict with other “general equilibrium” management objectives related to developing a successful corporate culture that promotes collaboration and innovation. This explains why many companies, particularly companies that have a large number of growth options, choose alternatives to discounted cash flow, such as the internal rate of return.

Suggested Citation

  • Cornell, Bradford, 2015. "Capital budgeting: a “general equilibrium” analysis," Journal of Financial Perspectives, EY Global FS Institute, vol. 3(1), pages 225-232.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:jofipe:0066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Capital budgeting; discount rates;

    JEL classification:

    • G31 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:jofipe:0066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ms Alina Stefan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ey.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.