IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/integr/0591.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Lisbon Agenda and Innovation-oriented Cohesion Policy: A New Challenge for Economic Integration among the EU Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Wamser, Georg

    (University of Tuebingen)

  • Nam, Chang Woon

    (Ifo Institute, Munich & University of Applied Management)

  • Schoenberg, Alina

    (Bundeswehr University)

Abstract

The EU’s cohesion policy should now be confluent with the goals of the Lisbon strategy by promoting growth and employment. In this context the promotion of regional innovation systems has become important in the EU for guaranteeing long-term regional economic growth. This paper investigates the major determinants of varying degrees of innovation promotion from one region to another provided in the context of the EU’s regional support program for the periods 2000~2006 and 2007~2013. While the new innovation-oriented policy appears to be incompatible with the goal of economic convergence among European regions, our research findings further question the consistency between the cohesion policy’s objectives and its practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Wamser, Georg & Nam, Chang Woon & Schoenberg, Alina, 2013. "The Lisbon Agenda and Innovation-oriented Cohesion Policy: A New Challenge for Economic Integration among the EU Regions," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 28, pages 37-58.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:integr:0591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://sejong.metapress.com/
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roberta Arbolino & Raffaele Boffardi, 2017. "The Impact of Institutional Quality and Efficient Cohesion Investments on Economic Growth Evidence from Italian Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    2. repec:ces:ifofor:v:19:y:2018:i:1:p:37-42 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Florian Bartholomae & Chang Woon Nam & Alina Schoenberg, 2017. "Urban shrinkage and resurgence in Germany," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(12), pages 2701-2718, September.
    4. Chang Woon Nam, 2017. "R&D and Innovation Promotion in the Context of EU Cohesion Policy: The Case of the Spanish Regions," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 18(03), pages 25-26, November.
    5. Vicente Rios & Pedro Pascual Arzoz & BelÉn iraizoz Apezteguia, 2016. "Development Differentials and Interaction Effects in the European Regions: A Study Based on the Regional Lisbon Index," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(3), pages 347-364, July.
    6. Zoltán Birkner & Ádám Mészáros & István Szabó, 2021. "Lessons Learnt: Changes in the Methodology of the Entrepreneurial Discovery Process in Defining the Priorities of Hungarian Smart Specialisation Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    7. R. Arbolino & R. Boffardi, 2017. "The Role of Regional Institutions in Research and Innovation Investments of Italy's Cohesion Policy," Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1-2, pages 167-192.
    8. repec:ces:ifofor:v:19:y:2018:i:1:p:32-36 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Roberta Arbolino & Raffaele Boffardi & Luisa De Simone, 2019. "Which are the Factors Influencing Innovation Performances? Evidence from Italian Cohesion Policy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 221-247, November.
    10. Vladimir Chernov & Luidmyla Dorokhova & Oleksandr Dorokhov, 2016. "Fuzzy Approach to Estimates Entropy and Risks for Innovative Projects and Programs," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 12(3), pages 55-68.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Lisbon Agenda; Regional Innovation Network; EU Cohesion Policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:integr:0591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yunhoe Kim (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/desejkr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.