IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/etheco/0009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La difficile prise en compte des inégalités socio-économiques par le commerce équitable: le cas du quinoa andin

Author

Listed:
  • Carimentrand, Aurélie

    (Université de bordeaux 3)

Abstract

This paper argues that fair trade schemes in the quinoa market of south Bolivia are not an effective instrument to reduce social inequalities. Beyond the façade of fair trade marks and labels, the reality of Bolivia points to an important way in which customer expectations are disappointed.

Suggested Citation

  • Carimentrand, Aurélie, 2009. "La difficile prise en compte des inégalités socio-économiques par le commerce équitable: le cas du quinoa andin," Ethics and Economics, CREUM, Université de Montréal, vol. 6(2), pages 1-11.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:etheco:0009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ethique-economique.net
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lemeilleur, Sylvaine & Allaire, Gilles, 2016. "Standardisation and guarantee systems: what can participatory certification offer?," Working Papers MOISA 250275, Institut National de la recherché Agronomique (INRA), UMR MOISA : Marchés, Organisations, Institutions et Stratégies d'Acteurs : CIHEAM-IAMM, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
    2. Arnaud Eve, 2019. "Colloque Management de la Qualité : Coûts et rentabilité de la qualité," Post-Print hal-02156398, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bolivia; Fair Trade; Inequalities;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O54 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Latin America; Caribbean

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:etheco:0009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: David Robichaud (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.creum.umontreal.ca/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.