IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/buecrj/0391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do German Green Mutual Funds Perform Better Than Their Peers?

Author

Listed:
  • Fernández, Manuel Salazar

    (Deloitte & Master Candidate, Fachbereich Wirtschaft, Hochschule Fulda–University of Applied Sciences)

  • Abu-Alkheil, Ahmad

    (German Jordanian University)

  • M. Khartabiel, Ghadeer

    (Universiti Malaysia Perlis, School of Business Innovation & Technopreneurship)

Abstract

Due to current environment awareness, there has been an increase in investment opportunities concerning mutual funds with a focus on environmental issues. This paper analyzes the performance and risk sensitivities of German green mutual funds in comparison with their German socially responsible investment (SRI) and conventional peers. We also evaluate the results of the German green mutual funds in different market conditions. Because of this, we use and compare this performance during three periods, differentiating crises and non-crisis periods. In order to implement this analysis, we apply a CAPM-1 factor and a Carhart 4-factor methodology and find that in the full sample period 2007–2018 period, environmental funds had lower performance than conventional funds and SRI funds with similar characteristics. However, if we focus on crisis and non-crisis periods, the results change. During the financial crisis (2007–2009), green funds achieved adjusted returns slightly better than their peers; in the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis (2010-2012), the results are again similar to the results from the full sample period. And during the non-crisis period, they are not significantly different from conventional mutual funds, but they perform better than SRI mutual funds.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernández, Manuel Salazar & Abu-Alkheil, Ahmad & M. Khartabiel, Ghadeer, 2019. "Do German Green Mutual Funds Perform Better Than Their Peers?," Business and Economics Research Journal, Uludag University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 297-312, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:buecrj:0391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.berjournal.com/do-german-green-mutual-funds-perform-better-than-their-peers
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiago Gonçalves & Diego Pimentel & Cristina Gaio, 2021. "Risk and Performance of European Green and Conventional Funds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Iqbal Owadally & Jean-René Mwizere & Neema Kalidas & Kalyanie Murugesu & Muhammad Kashif, 2021. "Long-Term Sustainable Investment for Retirement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Mutual Funds; SRI Funds; Conventional Funds; Performance Evaluation; Crises/Non-Crises Periods;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F30 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - General
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:buecrj:0391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adem Anbar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiulutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.