Ecological and Economic Dissonance Debate on Kilimanjaro Region: Reflecting on 2-Basic Questions Case to Establish E1/E2

Studying the interaction between more than one variable, both in influence and action, is never easy, but establishing a key functional observation and question is extremely difficult for an academician. Therefore, the current literature tries to re-establish an empirical debate between bi-polar ends, taking the influence of destructive, destructive, and destructive limitations on both ecosystem (E1) and economic needs (E2). Kilimanjaro has been taken to represent a case in Tanzania reflecting African 4 – zones on economic agriculture, as it represents among sectors of the economy, 47 percent of GDP, and employs 85 percent of the Tanzanian population. The current literature refers to the Global perspective as Global warming covers Africa and the whole world reforms platforms. Institutional suggestions, therefore, cover solutions in terms of theoretical and empirical reflections for both. Economic parameters and statistical dimensions cover the most dynamic era of plans, actions, and the way forward (the 1990s -2000s). The evils of poverty have been linked to the impacts of unbalanced Dr. Msaki’s ratio (GE1/GE2=ɼ˚), where questions A and B articulate different platforms for future research. The literature concludes by re-establishing an implementation cycle of roots I and II focused on balancing the criterion of ɼ˚- establishment in terms of culture, strategies, focus, and policies.